The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
06-4985•Donald Ivan McCray v. CHAPEL HILL POLICE DEPARTMENT; REBECCA KOCH, Sergeant, Chapel Hill Police
06-4985Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitJan 31, 2008
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 08-6495
DONALD IVAN MCCRAY,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
CHAPEL HILL POLICE DEPARTMENT; REBECCA KOCH, Sergeant, Chapel
Hill Police,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle
District of North Carolina, at Durham. Paul Trevor Sharp,
Magistrate Judge. (1:06-cv-00984-PTS)
Submitted: August 21, 2008 Decided: August 26, 2008
Before WILLIAMS, Chief Judge, and KING and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Donald Ivan McCray, Appellant Pro Se. Kari Russwurm Johnson,
CRANFILL, SUMNER & HARTZOG, LLP, Raleigh, North Carolina, for
Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
*The parties consented to referral to a magistrate judge for
final disposition under 28 U.S.C. § 636 (c) (2000).
2
PER CURIAM:
Donald Ivan McCray appeals the district court’s * order
denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint. We have
reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we
affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. McCray v.
Chapel Hill Police Dep’t, No. 1:06-cv-00984-PTS (M.D.N.C., Mar. 19,
2008). We also deny McCray’s motion to appoint counsel. We
dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions
are adequately presented in the materials before the court and
argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.