The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
06-4813•United States of America v. James Riley Alexander
06-4813Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitMay 4, 2007
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 06-4813
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
versus
JAMES RILEY ALEXANDER,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western
District of North Carolina, at Charlotte. Richard L. Voorhees,
District Judge. (3:92-cr-00053-2)
Submitted: March 30, 2007 Decided: May 4, 2007
Before NIEMEYER, MICHAEL, and MOTZ, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Peter Adolf, FEDERAL DEFENDERS OF WESTERN NORTH CAROLINA, INC.,
Charlotte, North Carolina, for Appellant. Gretchen C. F. Shappert,
United States Attorney, Amy E. Ray, Assistant United States
Attorney, Asheville, North Carolina, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
- 2 -
PER CURIAM:
James Riley Alexander was found guilty of violating his
supervised release and was sentenced to sixty months of
imprisonment, the top of his advisory Sentencing Guidelines range.
On appeal, Alexander alleges that his sentence was erroneous.
Because we find that Alexander’s sentence is not plainly
unreasonable, United States v. Crudup, 461 F.3d 433, 437 (4th Cir.
2006) (stating review standard), we affirm. We dispense with oral
argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately
presented in the materials before the court and argument would not
aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.