The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
06-4342•Michael McNeill v. Officer Jordan
06-4342Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitFeb 26, 2008
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 08-7080
MICHAEL MCNEILL,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
OFFICER JORDAN; ERICA DRATWA; SERGEANT ADAMS; SERGEANT SPATES;
CAPTAIN MEEKS; LIEUTENANT GAWONIAWITCH,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. Louise W. Flanagan, Chief
District Judge. (5:08-ct-03040-FL)
Submitted: September 11, 2008 Decided: September 17, 2008
Before WILKINSON and NIEMEYER, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior
Circuit Judge.
Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Michael McNeill, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Michael McNeill appeals the district court’s order
dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint as frivolous under
28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B) (2000). We have reviewed the record and
find that this appeal is frivolous. Accordingly, we dismiss the
appeal for the reasons stated by the district court. McNeill v.
Jordan, No. 5:08-ct-03040-FL (E.D.N.C. June 17, 2008). We dispense
with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are
adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument
would not aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.