The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
06-2337•Chukwuma E. Azubuko v. the United States District Court for the Northern District of Georgia
06-2337Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitJun 26, 2007
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 06-2337
CHUKWUMA E. AZUBUKO,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA; THE ELEVENTH
CIRCUIT,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. Terrence W. Boyle,
District Judge. (5:04-cv-00735-BO)
Submitted: June 21, 2007 Decided: June 26, 2007
Before NIEMEYER, WILLIAMS, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Chukwuma E. Azubuko, Appellant Pro Se. Joshua B. Royster, UNITED
STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, Raleigh, North Carolina, for
Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
- 2 -
PER CURIAM:
Chukwuma E. Azubuko appeals the district court’s order
denying his “Second Motion for Reconsideration.” We conclude that
the district court did not abuse its discretion in denying
Azubuko’s motion to reconsider. See United States v. Winestock,
340 F.3d 200, 204 (4th Cir. 2003) (providing standard for Fed. R.
Civ. P. 60(b) motions); see also Bogart v. Chappell, 396 F.3d 548,
555 (4th Cir. 2005) (providing standard for Fed. R. Civ. P. 59(e)
motions). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and
legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before
the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.