The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
06-2335•Bryan O’neal Benson v. Vance County Sheriff
06-2335Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitJun 19, 2007
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 06-2335
BRYAN O’NEAL BENSON,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
VANCE COUNTY SHERIFF; JOHN DOE DEPUTY SHERIFF;
LIEUTENANT WELDON BULLOCK,
Defendants - Appellees,
and
SERGEANT STERLIN WALKER,
Defendant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. W. Earl Britt, Senior
District Judge. (5:05-cv-00506-BR)
Submitted: June 15, 2007 Decided: June 19, 2007
Before WIDENER, MICHAEL, and KING, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Bryan O’Neal Benson, Appellant Pro Se. James Redfern Morgan, Jr.,
Robert T. Numbers, II, WOMBLE, CARLYLE, SANDRIDGE & RICE, PLLC,
Winston-Salem, North Carolina, for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
- 2 -
PER CURIAM:
Bryan O’Neal Benson appeals the district court’s order
denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint. We have
reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we
affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Benson v.
Vance County Sheriff, No. 5:05-cv-00506-BR (E.D.N.C. Dec. 12,
2006). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal
contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the
court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.