The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
06-2306•Raleigh Adolph Bellamy v. Nationwide Insurance Company
06-2306Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitMay 14, 2007
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 06-2306
RALEIGH ADOLPH BELLAMY,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
NATIONWIDE INSURANCE COMPANY; TOWN & COUNTRY
FORD,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western
District of North Carolina, at Charlotte. Robert J. Conrad, Jr.,
Chief District Judge. (3:06-cv-00072)
Submitted: May 10, 2007 Decided: May 14, 2007
Before MOTZ and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior
Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Raleigh Adolph Bellamy, Appellant Pro Se. William Couchell
Robinson, ROBINSON ELLIOTT & SMITH, Charlotte, North Carolina;
Jami J. Farris, PARKER POE ADAMS & BERNSTEIN, LLP, Charlotte, North
Carolina, for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
- 2 -
PER CURIAM:
Raleigh Adolph Bellamy appeals the district court’s order
accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and dismissing
his complaint without prejudice. We have reviewed the record and
find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons
stated by the district court. Bellamy v. Nationwide Ins. Co., No.
3:06-cv-00072 (W.D.N.C. Nov. 21, 2006). We dispense with oral
argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately
presented in the materials before the court and argument would not
aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.