The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
06-2291•Lawrence Verline Wilder, Sr v. Warshaw One LLC., Inc
06-2291Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitApr 30, 2007
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 06-2291
LAWRENCE VERLINE WILDER, SR.,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
WARSHAW ONE LLC., INC; SANDRA DORSEY;
BALTIMORE COUNTY POLICE DEPARTMENT,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
Maryland, at Baltimore. Catherine C. Blake, District Judge.
(1:06-cv-02504-CCB)
Submitted: April 26, 2007 Decided: April 30, 2007
Before WILLIAMS, MICHAEL, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Lawrence Verline Wilder, Sr., Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
- 2 -
PER CURIAM:
Lawrence Verline Wilder, Sr., appeals the district
court’s order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000)
complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible
error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the
district court. Wilder v. Warshaw One LLC., Inc., No. 1:06-cv-
02504-CCB (D. Md. Nov. 30, 2006). We dispense with oral argument
because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in
the materials before the court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.