The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
06-2275•Joyce Joanne Woolridge v. Securitas Security Services USA, Incorporated
06-2275Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitMar 27, 2007
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 06-2275
JOYCE JOANNE WOOLRIDGE,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
SECURITAS SECURITY SERVICES USA, INCORPORATED,
Defendant - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of Virginia, at Richmond. Robert E. Payne, District
Judge. (3:06-cv-00573-REP)
Submitted: March 22, 2007 Decided: March 27, 2007
Before WIDENER and WILKINSON, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior
Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Joyce Joanne Woolridge, Appellant Pro Se. Robert G. Ames, Lesley
Anne Pate, VENABLE, LLP, Washington, D.C., for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
- 2 -
PER CURIAM:
Joyce Joanne Woolridge appeals the district court’s order
granting the Defendant’s motion to dismiss her civil action without
prejudice. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible
error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the
district court. See Woolridge v. Securitas Sec. Servs. USA, Inc.,
No. 3:06-cv-00573-REP (E.D. Va. filed Nov. 21, 2006; entered Nov.
22, 2006). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and
legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before
the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.