The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
06-2264•United States of America v. Jacob Wayne Long
06-2264Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitJul 10, 2007
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 06-2264
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
versus
JACOB WAYNE LONG,
Claimant - Appellant,
and
$1197.00 US CURRENCY; ONE 1967 CAMARO
CHEVROLET, Vin #124377N13878; ONE 1997
KAWASAKI 4-WHEELER, Vin #JKAVFKB12WB500920;
ONE 1991 MAZDA SUV, Vin #4F2CU44XMUM12755; ONE
1987 ITASCA CHEVROLET R/V CAMPER, Vin
#1GBKP37W7H3328434,
Defendants.
No. 07-1133
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
versus
RONALD LONG,
Claimant - Appellant,
and
-- 1 of 3 --
- 2 -
$1197.00 US CURRENCY; ONE 1967 CAMARO
CHEVROLET, Vin #124377N13878; ONE 1997
KAWASAKI 4-WHEELER, Vin #JKAVFKB12WB500920;
ONE 1991 MAZDA SUV, Vin #4F2CU44XMUM12755; ONE
1987 ITASCA CHEVROLET R/V CAMPER, Vin
#1GBKP37W7H3328434,
Defendants.
Appeals from the United States District Court for the Middle
District of North Carolina, at Durham. William L. Osteen, Senior
District Judge. (1:00-cv-00164-WLO)
Submitted: June 15, 2007 Decided: July 10, 2007
Before MICHAEL and MOTZ, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior
Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Jacob Wayne Long and Ronald Long, Appellants Pro Se. Lynne P.
Klauer, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Greensboro, North
Carolina, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 2 of 3 --
- 3 -
PER CURIAM:
In these consolidated appeals, Jacob W. Long and Ronald
Long appeal the district court’s order denying their motions to set
aside default judgment. We have reviewed the record and find no
reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by
the district court. United States v. Long and United States v.
$1197.00 US Currency, No. 1:00-cv-00164-WLO (M.D.N.C. Aug. 31, 2006
& Sept. 1, 2006). We dispense with oral argument because the facts
and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials
before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 3 of 3 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.