The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
06-2244•William W. Spencer, Jr v. DONALD H. RUMSFELD, Secretary of Defense, U.S. Department of Defense, Pentagon
06-2244Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitJul 24, 2007
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 06-2244
WILLIAM W. SPENCER, JR.,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
DONALD H. RUMSFELD, Secretary of Defense,
U.S. Department of Defense, Pentagon,
Defendant - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Claude M. Hilton, Senior
District Judge. (1:05-cv-00730-CMH)
Submitted: July 6, 2007 Decided: July 24, 2007
Before WILKINSON, MICHAEL, and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Paula M. Potoczak, Traci L. Buschner, PAULA M. POTOCZAK, L.L.C.,
Alexandria, Virginia, for Appellant. Chuck Rosenberg, United States
Attorney, Kevin J. Mikolashek, Assistant United States Attorney,
Alexandria, Virginia, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
- 2 -
PER CURIAM:
William W. Spencer, Jr., appeals the district court’s
order dismissing Spencer’s complaint. We have reviewed the record
and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the
reasons stated by the district court. Spencer v. Rumsfeld, No.
1:05-cv-00730-CMH (E.D. Va. Sept. 15, 2006). We dispense with oral
argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately
presented in the materials before the court and argument would not
aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.