Monlogni Clement Mitokpe v. Doherty, 502 U.S. 314, 323-24 1992 setting forth standard of review . Accordingly,…

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 06-2236
MONLOGNI CLEMENT MITOKPE,
Petitioner,
versus
ALBERTO R. GONZALES, Attorney General,
Respondent.
On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration
Appeals. (A95-221-902)
Submitted: July 18, 2007 Decided: August 2, 2007
Before WILKINSON, MOTZ, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.
Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Irena I. Karpinski, Washington, D.C., for Petitioner. Peter D.
Keisler, Assistant Attorney General, Carol Federighi, Senior
Litigation Counsel, Stacey I. Young, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF
JUSTICE, Washington, D.C., for Respondent.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

-- 1 of 2 --

- 2 -
PER CURIAM:
Monlogni Clement Mitokpe, a native and citizen of Togo,
petitions for review of an order of the Board of Immigration
Appeals (Board) denying his motion to reopen. We have reviewed the
record and the Board’s order and find that the Board did not abuse
its discretion in denying the motion to reopen on the ground that
it was untimely filed. See 8 U.S.C.A. § 1229a(c)(7)(C) (West 2005
& Supp. 2007) (establishing a ninety-day time limitation for filing
a motion to reopen); 8 C.F.R. § 1003.2(c)(2) (2007) (same); INS v.
Doherty, 502 U.S. 314, 323-24 (1992) (setting forth standard of
review).
Accordingly, we deny the petition for review. We
dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions
are adequately presented in the materials before the court and
argument would not aid the decisional process.
PETITION DENIED

-- 2 of 2 --