The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
06-2182•David E. Henderson v. Bureau of Alcohol, Firearms, Tobacco & Explosives
06-2182Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitMay 29, 2008
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 08-2016
DAVID E. HENDERSON,
Plaintiff – Appellant,
v.
BUREAU OF ALCOHOL, FIREARMS, TOBACCO & EXPLOSIVES; BUREAU OF
IMMIGRATION AND CUSTOMS ENFORCEMENT; DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND
SECURITY; JUDGE MULKASEY, United States Department of
Justice; ROBERT MUELLER, Federal Bureau of Investigation,
Defendants – Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
Maryland, at Baltimore. William D. Quarles, Jr., District
Judge. (1:08-cv-1845-WDQ)
Submitted: December 11, 2008 Decided: December 15, 2008
Before NIEMEYER, DUNCAN, and AGEE, Circuit Judges.
Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
David E. Henderson, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
David E. Henderson appeals the district court’s order
granting his request to proceed in forma pauperis but dismissing
this case as patently frivolous under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B)
(2000). We have reviewed the record and find that this appeal
is frivolous. Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal for the
reasons stated by the district court. Henderson v. Bureau of
Alcohol, Firearms, Tobacco & Explosives, No. 1:08-cv-01845-WDQ
(D. Md. Aug. 29, 2008). We dispense with oral argument because
the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the
materials before the court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
DISMISSED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.