The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
06-2166•James H. Pickett, Jr v. John E. Potter
06-2166Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitApr 30, 2007
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 06-2166
JAMES H. PICKETT, JR.,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
JOHN E. POTTER,
Defendant - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Claude M. Hilton, Senior
District Judge. (1:05-cv-01210-CMH)
Submitted: April 26, 2007 Decided: April 30, 2007
Before WILLIAMS, MICHAEL, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
James H. Pickett, Jr., Appellant Pro Se. Ralph Andrew Price, Jr.,
OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Alexandria, Virginia, for
Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
- 2 -
PER CURIAM:
James H. Pickett, Jr., appeals the district court’s order
granting the Defendant’s motion to dismiss pursuant to Fed. R. Civ.
P. 12(b)(6). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible
error. Accordingly, we deny Pickett’s motion to appoint counsel,
and affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Pickett
v. Potter, No. 1:05-cv-01210-CMH (E.D. Va. Sept. 26, 2006). We
dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions
are adequately presented in the materials before the court and
argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.