The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
06-2163•Susan Solomon v. ALBERTO R. GONZALES, Attorney General of the United States
06-2163Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitFeb 27, 2007
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 06-2163
SUSAN SOLOMON,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
ALBERTO R. GONZALES, Attorney General of the
United States,
Defendant - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Claude M. Hilton, Senior
District Judge. (1:06-cv-00414-CMH)
Submitted: February 22, 2007 Decided: February 27, 2007
Before WILLIAMS, MOTZ, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Susan Solomon, Appellant Pro Se. Kevin Jason Mikolashek, OFFICE OF
THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Alexandria, Virginia, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
- 2 -
PER CURIAM:
Susan Solomon appeals the district court’s order
granting summary judgment in favor of the Appellee on Solomon’s
hostile work environment, disparate treatment, and retaliatory
discharge claims brought pursuant to Title VII of the Civil Rights
Act of 1964, as amended, 42 U.S.C. §§ 2000e to 2000e-17 (2000). We
have reviewed the record and find no reversible error.
Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district
court. See Solomon v. Gonzales, No. 1:06-cv-00414-CMH (E.D. Va.,
Sept. 27, 2006). We dispense with oral argument because the facts
and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials
before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.