The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
06-2155•Milton McCray v. Judge Richard Bennett
06-2155Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitApr 30, 2007
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 06-2155
MILTON MCCRAY,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
JUDGE RICHARD BENNETT; SUSQUEHANNA BANK;
MCGUIRE WOODS LLP; GORDON, FEINBLATT, ROTHMAN,
HOFFBERGER AND HOLLANDER, LLC,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
Maryland, at Baltimore. J. Frederick Motz, District Judge. (1:06-
cv-02182-JFM)
Submitted: April 26, 2007 Decided: April 30, 2007
Before WILLIAMS, MICHAEL, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Milton McCray, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
- 2 -
PER CURIAM:
Milton McCray appeals the district court’s order
dismissing his civil rights complaint. We have reviewed the record
and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the
reasons stated by the district court. McCray v. Bennett, No. 1:06-
cv-02182-JFM (D. Md. Aug. 30, 2006). We deny McCray’s motion to
enforce his rights and dispense with oral argument because the
facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the
materials before the court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.