Kazeem Ishola v. Gonzales, 435 F.3d 475, 481, 483 4th Cir. 2006 . Accordingly, we deny the

06-2096Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitMay 15, 2007

Full text

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 06-2096
KAZEEM ISHOLA,
Petitioner,
versus
ALBERTO R. GONZALES, Attorney General,
Respondent.
On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration
Appeals. (A73-534-825)
Submitted: May 7, 2007 Decided: May 15, 2007
Before WILLIAMS, KING, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.
Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Kazeem Ishola, Petitioner Pro Se. Daniel Eric Goldman, UNITED
STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, Washington, D.C., for Respondent.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

-- 1 of 2 --

- 2 -
PER CURIAM:
Kazeem Ishola, a native and citizen of Nigeria, seeks
review of an order of the Board of Immigration Appeals (Board)
affirming the Immigration Judge’s (IJ) denial of his motion to
reconsider. We have reviewed the administrative record and find no
abuse of discretion in the Board’s affirmance of the IJ’s order.
See 8 C.F.R. § 1003.23(b)(2) (2006); Jean v. Gonzales, 435 F.3d
475, 481, 483 (4th Cir. 2006).
Accordingly, we deny the petition for review, and deny as
moot Ishola’s motions to suspend the briefing order and for a stay
of deportation. We grant Ishola leave to proceed on appeal in
forma pauperis and dispense with oral argument because the facts
and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials
before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
PETITION DENIED

-- 2 of 2 --

Continue your research in ChatGPT or Claude

Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.