The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
06-2079•Beatrice Downs v. Henrico County
06-2079Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitApr 2, 2007
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 06-2079
BEATRICE DOWNS,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
HENRICO COUNTY; FEDERAL BUREAU OF
INVESTIGATION,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of Virginia, at Richmond. Robert E. Payne, District
Judge. (3:06-cv-00631-REP)
Submitted: March 29, 2007 Decided: April 2, 2007
Before MOTZ, TRAXLER, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Beatrice Downs, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
- 2 -
PER CURIAM:
Beatrice Downs appeals the district court’s order
dismissing her civil complaint because it lacks a basis in law or
fact. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error.
Accordingly, we deny her motion to expedite her appeal, her motion
to test the contents of her medication, and affirm for the reasons
stated by the district court. Downs v. Henrico County, No 3:06-cv-
00631-REP (E.D. Va. Oct. 3, 2006). We dispense with oral argument
because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in
the materials before the court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.