The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
06-2063•Floyd Bruce Mobley v. City of Chesapeake, Virginia
06-2063Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitApr 2, 2007
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 06-2063
FLOYD BRUCE MOBLEY,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
CITY OF CHESAPEAKE, VIRGINIA; CITY OF
CHESAPEAKE POLICE DEPARTMENT; JAMES J. BLOUNT,
Officer,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Jerome B. Friedman, District
Judge. (2:06-cv-00139-JBF)
Submitted: March 29, 2007 Decided: April 2, 2007
Before MOTZ, TRAXLER, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Floyd Bruce Mobley, Appellant Pro Se. Alan Brody Rashkind,
FURNISS, DAVIS, RASHKIND & SAUNDERS, Norfolk, Virginia, for
Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
- 2 -
PER CURIAM:
Floyd Bruce Mobley appeals the district court’s order
denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint. We have
reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we
affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Mobley v.
City of Chesapeake, No. 2:06-cv-00139-JBF (E.D. Va. Aug. 30, 2006).
We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal
contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the
court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.