Richard A. Miller, Sr v. U.s. Department of Housing & Urban Development

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 06-2053
RICHARD A. MILLER, SR.,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING & URBAN
DEVELOPMENT; DRUCKER & FAULK, LLC; THETFORD
PROPERTIES III, LIMITED PARTNERSHIP/THETFORD
PROPERTY MANAGEMENT, INCORPORATED, d/b/a
Beaumont Avenue Apartments; RICHARD A. URBAN,
Individually and as General Partner, Thetford
Property Management, Incorporated; DIANE A.
PICKETT, Individually and as Clerk of Court of
Alamance County; TERRY JOHNSON, Individually
and as Sheriff of Alamance County; WILLIAM K.
BROWNLEE, Individually and as Counsel for
Thetford Property Management, Incorporated;
TAMMY EGGLESTON, Individually and as Property
Manager of Beaumont Avenue Apartments; JAMES
K. ROBERSON, Individually and as Chief
District Court Judge of Alamance County,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle
District of North Carolina, at Durham. N. Carlton Tilley, Jr.,
Chief District Judge. (1:05-cv-01045-NCT)
Submitted: January 3, 2007 Decided: February 6, 2007
Before WILLIAMS, MOTZ, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

-- 1 of 3 --

- 2 -
Richard A. Miller, Sr., Appellant Pro Se. Cheryl Thornton Sloan,
OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Greensboro, North Carolina;
Grady L. Balentine, NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, Raleigh,
North Carolina; James Redfern Morgan, Jr., Christopher J. Geis,
Robert T. Numbers, II, WOMBLE, CARLYLE, SANDRIDGE & RICE, PLLC,
Winston-Salem, North Carolina; Robert Lynn McClellan, IVEY,
MCCLELLAN, GATTON & TALCOTT, LLP., Greensboro, North Carolina, for
Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

-- 2 of 3 --

- 3 -
PER CURIAM:
Richard A. Miller, Sr. appeals the district court’s order
denying Miller’s motion for a preliminary injunction pursuant to
Fed. R. Civ. P. 65(a), denying Miller’s motion for defendants to
bear the cost for service of summons pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P.
4(d), granting defendant Tammy Eggleston’s motion to set aside
entry of default judgment pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 55(c), and
granting all defendants’ motions to dismiss pursuant to Fed. R.
Civ. P. 12(b). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible
error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the
district court. See Miller v. U.S. Dep’t of Housing & Urban Dev.,
No. 1:05-cv-01045-NCT (M.D.N.C. Aug. 29, 2006). We dispense with
oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are
adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument
would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED

-- 3 of 3 --