The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
06-1997•John Dunaway v. DALE E. HARTFORD, G.L.R. of I.A.M
06-1997Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitDec 13, 2006
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 06-1997
JOHN DUNAWAY,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
DALE E. HARTFORD, G.L.R. of I.A.M.,
Defendant - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
Maryland, at Baltimore. Benson Everett Legg, Chief District Judge.
(1:03-cv-03398-BEL)
Submitted: November 20, 2006 Decided: December 13, 2006
Before NIEMEYER, WILLIAMS, and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
John Dunaway, Appellant Pro Se. Joel Allen Smith, Steven Marc
Lubar, Jeffrey M. Ross, KAHN, SMITH & COLLINS, PA, Baltimore,
Maryland, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
- 2 -
PER CURIAM:
John Dunaway appeals the district court order granting
Dale E. Hartford’s motion for summary judgment and dismissing his
complaint. We have reviewed the record and the district court
order and affirm for the reasons cited by the district court. See
Dunaway v. Hartford, No. 1:03-cv-03398-BEL (D. Md. filed Aug. 30,
2006; entered Aug. 31, 2006). We deny the motion for sanctions.
We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal
contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the
court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.