The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
06-1986•Pamela Brunner v. Montgomery County Public Schools
06-1986Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitDec 5, 2007
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 08-1314
PAMELA BRUNNER,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
MONTGOMERY COUNTY PUBLIC SCHOOLS,
Defendant - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
Maryland, at Baltimore. J. Frederick Motz, District Judge. (1:06-
cv-02336-JFM)
Submitted: June 26, 2008 Decided: June 30, 2008
Before KING and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges, and WILKINS, Senior Circuit
Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Pamela Brunner, Appellant Pro Se. Judith S. Bresler, Eric Charles
Brousaides, Columbia, Maryland, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
- 2 -
PER CURIAM:
Pamela Brunner appeals the district court’s order
dismissing her claims of employment discrimination. We have
reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we
affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Brunner
v. Montgomery County Pub. Sch., No: 1:06-cv-02336-JFM (D. Md. Feb.
19, 2008). We deny Appellee’s motion to strike Brunner’s reply
brief. We also deny Brunner’s motion to supplement her reply
brief. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal
contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the
court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.