The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
06-1910•Theresa Sparrow v. Michael J. Astrue
06-1910Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitAug 10, 2007
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 06-1910
THERESA SPARROW,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
MICHAEL J. ASTRUE,
Defendant - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. William A. Webb,
Magistrate Judge. (4:05-cv-00150-WW)
Submitted: July 25, 2007 Decided: August 10, 2007
Before MOTZ, GREGORY, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Brian M. Ricci, EDWARDS & RICCI, PA, Greenville, North Carolina,
for Appellant. George E.B. Holding, United States Attorney, Anne
M. Hayes, Joshua B. Royster, Assistant United States Attorneys,
Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
*The parties consented to the exercise of jurisdiction by the
magistrate judge.
- 2 -
PER CURIAM:
Theresa Sparrow appeals the order of the magistrate judge
upholding the denial of disability insurance benefits. * We have
reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we
affirm for the reasons stated by the magistrate judge. Sparrow v.
Astrue, No. 4:05-cv-00150-WW (E.D.N.C. Aug. 1, 2006). We dispense
with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are
adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument
would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.