The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
06-1827•Doreka Jones v. and TINA MAYFIELD
06-1827Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitDec 18, 2006
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 06-1827
DOREKA JONES,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
and
TINA MAYFIELD; ANGELA DAVIS; GREG POWELL;
YVETTE MANNING; TAMIKA CHANEY; MARSAILLE
POWELL,
Plaintiffs,
verus
PIZZA HUT OF NEW BERN, INCORPORATED,
Defendant - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of North Carolina, at Greenville. Malcolm J. Howard,
Senior District Judge. (4:04-cv-00004-H)
Submitted: December 14, 2006 Decided: December 18, 2006
Before MICHAEL, GREGORY, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Doreka Jones, Appellant Pro Se. Kevin S. Simon, FISHER & PHILLIPS,
LLP, Chicago, Illinois, for Appellee.
-- 1 of 3 --
- 2 -
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 2 of 3 --
- 3 -
PER CURIAM:
Doreka Jones appeals the district court’s order granting
summary judgment for her employer and dismissing her civil action
alleging employment discrimination in violation of 42 U.S.C. § 1981
(2000). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error.
Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district
court. Jones v. Pizza Hut of New Bern, Inc., No. 4:04-cv-00004-H
(E.D.N.C. Aug. 5, 2005). We dispense with oral argument because
the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the
materials before the court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 3 of 3 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.