The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
06-1822•Carolyn E. O'connor v. Aamco/cinnat, Incorporated
06-1822Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitNov 28, 2006
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 06-1822
CAROLYN E. O'CONNOR,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
AAMCO/CINNAT, INCORPORATED; COMMONWEALTH OF
MASSACHUSETTS,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of Virginia, at Richmond. Robert E. Payne, District
Judge. (3:06-cv-00328-REP)
Submitted: November 21, 2006 Decided: November 28, 2006
Before TRAXLER and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior
Circuit Judge.
Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Carolyn E. O’Connor, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
-- 1 of 2 --
- 2 -
PER CURIAM:
Carolyn E. O’Connor appeals the district court’s order
dismissing as frivolous her civil action. We have reviewed the
record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny
O’Connor’s motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and
dismiss the appeal for the reasons stated by the district court.
See O’Connor v. AAMCO/Cinnat, Inc., No. 3:06-cv-00328-REP (E.D. Va.
filed June 5, 2006 & entered June 6, 2006). We dispense with oral
argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately
presented in the materials before the court and argument would not
aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.