The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
06-1760•Vivian M. Kelley v. UNIVERSITY OF RICHMOND, School of Continuing Studies
06-1760Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitDec 27, 2006
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 06-1760
VIVIAN M. KELLEY,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
UNIVERSITY OF RICHMOND, School of Continuing
Studies,
Defendant - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of Virginia, at Richmond. James R. Spencer, Chief
District Judge. (3:06-cv-00203-JRS)
Submitted: November 30, 2006 Decided: December 27, 2006
Before NIEMEYER, MICHAEL, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Vivian M. Kelley, Appellant Pro Se. Gilbert Everett Schill, Jr.,
Stephanie Ploszay Karn, MCGUIREWOODS, L.L.P., Richmond, Virginia,
for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
- 2 -
PER CURIAM:
Vivian M. Kelley appeals the district court’s order
granting the University of Richmond’s Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b)(6)
motion to dismiss her complaint for failure to state a claim upon
which relief can be granted. We have reviewed the record and find
no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated
by the district court. See Kelley v. Univ. of Richmond, No. 3:06-
cv-00203-JRS (E.D. Va. June 2, 2006). We further deny Kelley’s
motion for appointment of counsel. We dispense with oral argument
because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in
the materials before the court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.