The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
06-1738•Evelina R. Cavett v. DONALD H. RUMSFELD, Secretary, Department of Defense
06-1738Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitJan 29, 2007
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 06-1738
EVELINA R. CAVETT,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
DONALD H. RUMSFELD, Secretary, Department of
Defense,
Defendant - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of North Carolina, at Wilmington. James C. Fox, Senior
District Judge. (7:05-cv-00109-F)
Submitted: January 25, 2007 Decided: January 29, 2007
Before WIDENER and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior
Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Ernest J. Wright, WRIGHT LAW FIRM, Jacksonville, North Carolina,
for Appellant. George E.B. Holding, United States Attorney, Anne
M. Hayes, Steve R. Matheny, Assistant United States Attorneys,
Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
- 2 -
PER CURIAM:
Evelina R. Cavett appeals the district court’s order
granting summary judgment in favor of Donald H. Rumsfeld, Secretary
of Defense, on Cavett’s claims of race, color and national origin,
hostile work environment, harassment and discriminatory refusal to
rehire, claims brought pursuant to Title VII of the Civil Rights
Act of 1964, as amended, 42 U.S.C. §§ 2000e to 2000e-17 (2000). We
have reviewed the record and find no reversible error.
Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district
court. See Cavett v. Rumsfeld, No. 7:05-cv-00109-F (E.D.N.C. May
25, 2006). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and
legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before
the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.