The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
06-1729•Moses Jalloh v. Target Corporation
06-1729Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitDec 28, 2006
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 06-1729
MOSES JALLOH,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
TARGET CORPORATION,
Defendant - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
Maryland, at Greenbelt. Deborah K. Chasanow, District Judge.
(8:05-cv-02354-DKC)
Submitted: December 21, 2006 Decided: December 28, 2006
Before NIEMEYER, WILLIAMS, and KING, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Moses Jalloh, Appellant Pro Se. Bernard Phillip Jeweler, OGLETREE,
DEAKINS, NASH, SMOAK & STEWART, PC, Washington, D.C., for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
- 2 -
PER CURIAM:
Moses Jalloh appeals the district court’s order granting
summary judgment in favor of Target Corporation in Jalloh’s
employment discrimination action. We have reviewed the record and
find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons
stated by the district court. Jalloh v. Target Corp., No. 8:05-cv-
02354-DKC (D. Md. June 15, 2006). We dispense with oral argument
because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in
the materials before the court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.