The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
06-1722•Darla R. Floyd v. Nationwide Mutual Insurance Company
06-1722Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitMar 13, 2007
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 06-1722
DARLA R. FLOYD; DANA NICHOLE FLOYD,
Plaintiffs - Appellees,
versus
NATIONWIDE MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
South Carolina, at Greenville. G. Ross Anderson, Jr., District
Judge. (6:04-cv-01305-GRA)
Submitted: March 2, 2007 Decided: March 13, 2007
Before WILKINSON, WILLIAMS, and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
John R. Murphy, Adam J. Neil, MURPHY & GRANTLAND, P.A., Columbia,
South Carolina, for Appellant. John Shannon Nichols, BLUESTEIN &
NICHOLS, LLC, Columbia, South Carolina; Bryan D. Ramey, BRYAN D.
RAMEY & ASSOCIATES, Piedmont, South Carolina, for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
- 2 -
PER CURIAM:
Nationwide Mutual Insurance Company appeals the district
court’s order reforming Darla Floyd’s insurance policy to include
underinsured motorist coverage and allowing Floyd to stack the
coverage on her vehicles. We have reviewed the record and find no
reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by
the district court. Floyd v. Nationwide Mut. Ins. Co., No. 6:04-
cv-01305-GRA (D.S.C. May 18, 2006). We dispense with oral argument
because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in
the materials before the court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.