The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
06-1707•Ziad Akl, M.d., F.a.c.p v. William Dougherty, M.d
06-1707Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitNov 27, 2006
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 06-1707
ZIAD AKL, M.D., F.A.C.P.,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
WILLIAM DOUGHERTY, M.D.; BETH DYSON-MUSKOPF,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Claude M. Hilton, Senior
District Judge. (1:06-cv-00264-CMH)
Submitted: October 31, 2006 Decided: November 27, 2006
Before WILLIAMS, KING, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Ziad Akl, Appellant Pro Se. Karen-Faye McTavish, SHAW PITTMAN,
L.L.P., Washington, D.C., for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
-- 1 of 2 --
- 2 -
PER CURIAM:
Ziad Akl appeals the district court’s order granting
defendants’ motions to dismiss the complaint in this diversity
action. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error
in the district court’s ruling that the complaint fails to state a
claim on which relief can be granted. Accordingly, we affirm the
decision of the district court. Akl v. Dougherty, No. 1:06-cv-
00264-CMH (E.D. Va. filed June 7, 2006 & entered June 9, 2006). We
dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions
are adequately presented in the materials before the court and
argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.