The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
06-1642•061642.U
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 06-1642
SONIA JEANNINE BROWN,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
CARILION HEALTH SYSTEM; CARILION CONSOLIDATED
LABS,
Defendants - Appellees,
and
JUDY SNIPES; RANDY VANDEVANDER; RAYMOND
DUBOSE; MARK MURPHY,
Defendants.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western
District of Virginia, at Roanoke. Samuel G. Wilson, District
Judge. (7:05-cv-00487)
Submitted: February 7, 2007 Decided: February 16, 2007
Before MICHAEL, KING, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Sonia Jeannine Brown, Appellant Pro Se. Frank Kenneth Friedman,
Agnis Chandra Chakravorty, WOODS ROGERS, PLC, Roanoke, Virginia,
for Appellees.
-- 1 of 3 --
- 2 -
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 2 of 3 --
- 3 -
PER CURIAM:
Sonia Jeannine Brown appeals the district court’s order
granting summary judgment to Defendants in her 42 U.S.C. § 1983
(2000) action. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible
error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the
district court. Brown v. Carilion Health Sys., No. 7:05-cv-00487
(W.D. Va. May 3, 2006). We dispense with oral argument because the
facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the
materials before the court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 3 of 3 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.