The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
06-1616•David A. Campbell v. JOHN E. POTTER, Postmaster General
06-1616Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitOct 4, 2006
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 06-1616
DAVID A. CAMPBELL,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
JOHN E. POTTER, Postmaster General,
Defendant - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle
District of North Carolina, at Durham. James A. Beaty, Jr.,
District Judge. (1:04-cv-00989-JAB)
Submitted: September 28, 2006 Decided: October 4, 2006
Before NIEMEYER, TRAXLER, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
David A. Campbell, Appellant Pro Se. Anna Mills Wagoner, United
States Attorney; Joan Brodish Binkley, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES
ATTORNEY, Greensboro, North Carolina, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
-- 1 of 2 --
- 2 -
PER CURIAM:
David A. Campbell appeals the district court’s order
granting Defendant judgment in this employment discrimination and
retaliation action. We have reviewed the record and find no
reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by
the district court. Campbell v. Potter, No. 1:04-cv-00989-JAB
(M.D.N.C. Mar. 28, 2006; Apr. 20, 2006). We dispense with oral
argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately
presented in the materials before the court and argument would not
aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.