Cassandra F. Bullock v. Rehrig International, Incorporated

06-1613Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitDec 28, 2006

Full text

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 06-1613
CASSANDRA F. BULLOCK,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
REHRIG INTERNATIONAL, INCORPORATED,
Defendant - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of Virginia, at Richmond. James R. Spencer, Chief
District Judge. (3:05-cv-00697-JRS)
Submitted: December 21, 2006 Decided: December 28, 2006
Before NIEMEYER, WILLIAMS, and KING, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Henry W. McLaughlin, III, CENTRAL VIRGINIA LEGAL AID SOCIETY, INC.,
Richmond, Virginia, for Appellant. James P. McElligott, Jr.,
MCGUIREWOODS LLP, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

-- 1 of 2 --

- 2 -
PER CURIAM:
Cassandra F. Bullock appeals the district court’s order
granting summary judgment in favor of Rehrig International, Inc.,
on Bullock’s sex discrimination, sexual harassment, and retaliation
claims brought pursuant to Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of
1964, as amended, 42 U.S.C. §§ 2000e to 2000e-17 (2000). We have
reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we
affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Bullock
v. Rehrig Int’l, Inc., No. 3:05-cv-00697-JRS (E.D. Va. May 10,
2006). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal
contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the
court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED

-- 2 of 2 --

Continue your research in ChatGPT or Claude

Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.