Thomas E. Gust v. E. Norris Tolson

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 06-1597
THOMAS E. GUST; BRYON W. SISK; ROGER C.
HOWARD; TODD LEOPARD; MICHAEL MIRANDA; HERMAN
G. SHAMEL, JR.; DAVID L. BILES; THOMAS J.
SQUIREK,
Plaintiffs - Appellants,
versus
E. NORRIS TOLSON; EUGENE J. CELLA; J. MOODY;
G. D. DRUM; B. S. BLACKMON; EDWARD S. KOONCE;
E. K. MAXIE; T. A. SLEDGE; CARLA R. HELMS;
CAHN H. LE, all in their individual and
personal capacities,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western
District of North Carolina, at Charlotte. Graham C. Mullen, Senior
District Judge. (3:05-cv-00444)
Submitted: October 31, 2006 Decided: November 2, 2006
Before WILLIAMS, MICHAEL, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Thomas E. Gust, Bryon W. Sisk, Roger C. Howard, Todd Leopard,
Michael Miranda, Herman G. Shamel, Jr., David L. Biles, Thomas J.
Squirek, Appellants Pro Se. Michael David Youth, NORTH CAROLINA
DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, Raleigh, North Carolina; Sarah Beckett
Boehm, MCGUIREWOODS, L.L.P., Richmond, Virginia, Robert Aubrey Cox,

-- 1 of 3 --

- 2 -
Jr., MCGUIREWOODS, L.L.P., Charlotte, North Carolina, for
Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).

-- 2 of 3 --

- 3 -
PER CURIAM:
Thomas E. Gust, Bryon W. Sisk, Roger C. Howard, Todd
Leopard, Michael Miranda, Herman G. Shamel, Jr., David L. Biles,
and Thomas J. Squirek appeal the district court’s order granting
Appellees’ motions to dismiss. We have reviewed the record and
find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons
stated by the district court. Gust v. Tolson, No. 3:05-cv-00444
(W.D.N.C. May 9, 2006). We dispense with oral argument because the
facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the
materials before the court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
AFFIRMED

-- 3 of 3 --