The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
06-1578•Michael J. Sindram v. Tamara Saunders
06-1578Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitJul 24, 2006
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 06-1578
MICHAEL J. SINDRAM,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
TAMARA SAUNDERS; JOHN ZACKER,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
Maryland, at Greenbelt. Peter J. Messitte, District Judge. (8:06-
cv-00578-PJM)
Submitted: July 20, 2006 Decided: July 24, 2006
Before WIDENER and WILKINSON, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior
Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Michael J. Sindram, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
-- 1 of 2 --
- 2 -
PER CURIAM:
Michael Sindram appeals a district court judgment
summarily dismissing his complaint for having failed to state a
claim and for having failed to comply with the requirements of a
pre-filing injunction. We have reviewed the record and the
district court’s order and affirm for the reasons of the district
court. See Sindram v. Saunders, No. 8:06-cv-00578-PJM (D. Md. Mar.
6, 2006). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and
legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before
the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.