The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
06-1519•Elsayed Elfeky v. United States, 2:05-cv-00296-WDK E.D. Va. Apr. 14, 2006 . Absent circumstances not…
06-1519Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitNov 17, 2006
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 06-1519
ELSAYED ELFEKY,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Defendant - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Walter D. Kelley, Jr., District
Judge. (2:05-cv-00296-WDK)
Submitted: November 15, 2006 Decided: November 17, 2006
Before WIDENER, WILKINSON, and MOTZ, Circuit Judges.
Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Elsayed Elfeky, Appellant Pro Se. Mark Travis Coberly,
VANDERVENTER & BLACK, LLP, Norfolk, Virginia, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
-- 1 of 2 --
- 2 -
PER CURIAM:
Elsayed Elfeky seeks to appeal from the entry of a
consent agreement in his civil action. See Elfeky v. United
States, 2:05-cv-00296-WDK (E.D. Va. Apr. 14, 2006). Absent
circumstances not present here, we will not entertain an appeal
from a consent judgment. See Cohen v. Va. Elec. & Power Co., 788
F.2d 247, 249 (4th Cir. 1986); Thonen v. Jenkins, 455 F.2d 977, 977
(4th Cir. 1972). Accordingly, we dismiss Elfeky’s appeal. We
dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions
are adequately presented in the materials before the court and
argument would not aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.