The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
06-1492•Richard Varn v. Department of the Army
06-1492Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitDec 28, 2006
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 06-1492
RICHARD VARN,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY; FRANCIS J. HARVEY,
Secretary of the United States Army,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. Terrence W. Boyle,
District Judge. (5:05-cv-00226-BO)
Submitted: December 21, 2006 Decided: December 28, 2006
Before NIEMEYER, WILLIAMS, and KING, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Richard Varn, Appellant Pro Se. Lora M. Taylor, OFFICE OF THE
UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
- 2 -
PER CURIAM:
Richard Varn appeals from the district court’s order
granting summary judgment in favor of the Secretary of the Army on
his employment discrimination complaint. Our review of the record
and the district court’s opinion discloses no reversible error.
Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district
court. Varn v. Department of the Army, Case No. 5:05-cv-00226-BO
(E.D.N.C. Mar. 31, 2006). We dispense with oral argument because
the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the
materials before the court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.