The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
06-1460•Daniel S. O’shea v. LOCAL UNION NO. 639, International Brotherhood of Teamsters
06-1460Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitDec 18, 2006
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 06-1460
DANIEL S. O’SHEA,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
LOCAL UNION NO. 639, International Brotherhood
of Teamsters; UNITED PARCEL SERVICE,
INCORPORATED,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
Maryland, at Greenbelt. J. Frederick Motz, District Judge.
(8:05-cv-00937-JFM)
Submitted: December 14, 2006 Decided: December 18, 2006
Before MICHAEL, GREGORY, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Daniel S. O’Shea, Appellant Pro Se. Mark J. Murphy, MOONEY, GREEN,
BAKER & SAINDON, Washington, D.C.; Richard J. Hafets, DLA PIPER
RUDNICK GRAY CARY US LLP, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
- 2 -
PER CURIAM:
Daniel S. O’Shea appeals the district court’s order
granting summary judgment to the Defendants in his civil action.
We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error.
Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district
court. O’Shea v. Local Union No. 639, No. 8:05-cv-00937-JFM (D.
Md. Aug. 4, 2006) We dispense with oral argument because the facts
and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials
before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.