The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
06-1452•Danny Casteel v. Judith Davidson
06-1452Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitMay 24, 2007
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 06-1452
DANNY CASTEEL,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
JUDITH DAVIDSON; ROGER BAKER; EMMETT C.
WAMPLER; VIRGINIA DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western
District of Virginia, at Big Stone Gap. James P. Jones, Chief
District Judge. (2:06-cv-00001-jpj)
Submitted: May 9, 2007 Decided: May 24, 2007
Before MICHAEL, TRAXLER, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Steven R. Minor, R. Lucas Hobbs, ELLIOTT LAWSON & MINOR, P.C.,
Bristol, Virginia, for Appellant. Robert F. McDonnell, Attorney
General of Virginia, Maureen Riley Matsen, Deputy Attorney General,
Peter R. Messitt, Senior Assistant Attorney General, James C.
Stuchell, D. Nelson Daniel, Assistant Attorneys General, Richmond,
Virginia, for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
- 2 -
PER CURIAM:
Danny Casteel appeals the district court’s orders
granting the Defendants’ motion to dismiss and denying Casteel’s
motion to reopen. We have reviewed the record and find no
reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by
the district court. Casteel v. Davidson, No. 2:06-cv-00001-jpj
(W.D. Va. Jan. 31, 2006; Mar. 20, 2006). We dispense with oral
argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately
presented in the materials before the court and argument would not
aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.