Mauro Capurso v. ALBERTO R. GONZALES, Attorney General

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 06-1438
MAURO CAPURSO,
Petitioner,
versus
ALBERTO R. GONZALES, Attorney General,
Respondent.
On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration
Appeals. (A95-885-986)
Submitted: October 6, 2006 Decided: November 21, 2006
Before MICHAEL, TRAXLER, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.
Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Ralph J. DiPietro, THE LAW OFFICE OF RALPH J. DIPIETRO, P.C.,
Hyattsville, Maryland, for Petitioner. Peter D. Keisler, Assistant
Attorney General, M. Jocelyn Lopez Wright, Assistant Director,
James A. Hunolt, OFFICE OF IMMIGRATION LITIGATION, Washington,
D.C., for Respondent.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).

-- 1 of 2 --

- 2 -
PER CURIAM:
Mauro Capurso, a native and citizen of Venezuela,
petitions for review of an order of the Board of Immigration
Appeals (“Board”) denying his motion to reopen immigration
proceedings. We have reviewed the record and the Board’s order and
find that the Board did not abuse its discretion in denying the
motion to reopen. See 8 C.F.R. § 1003.2(a) (2006). Accordingly,
we deny the petition for review for the reasons stated by the
Board. See Capurso v. Gonzales, No. A95-885-986 (B.I.A. Mar. 15,
2006). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal
contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the
court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
PETITION DENIED

-- 2 of 2 --