Roger Chester Creech v. Harvey Fertilizer

06-1436Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitFeb 9, 2007

Full text

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 06-1436
ROGER CHESTER CREECH; BELVA ALDRIDGE CREECH,
Plaintiffs - Appellants,
versus
HARVEY FERTILIZER AND GAS COMPANY,
Defendant - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. Terrence W. Boyle,
District Judge. (5:04-cv-00933-BO; BK-02-07227-8-JRL)
Submitted: January 17, 2007 Decided: February 9, 2007
Before NIEMEYER, MICHAEL, and KING, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Walter L. Hinson, HINSON & RHYNE, P.A., Wilson, North Carolina, for
Appellants. Paul A. Fanning, WARD & SMITH, P.A., Greenville, North
Carolina, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

-- 1 of 2 --

- 2 -
PER CURIAM:
Roger Chester Creech and Belva Aldridge Creech appeal
from the district court’s order affirming the bankruptcy court’s
order finding excusable neglect and enlarging the time for Harvey
Fertilizer and Gas Company to file a deficiency claim in the
Creeches’ Chapter 12 bankruptcy case. We have reviewed the record
and decisions of the bankruptcy court and the district court and
find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons
stated by the district court. See Creech v. Harvey Fertilizer &
Gas Co., No. 5:04-cv-00933-BO (E.D.N.C. Feb. 28, 2006 & Mar. 1,
2006). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal
contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the
court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED

-- 2 of 2 --

Continue your research in ChatGPT or Claude

Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.