The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
06-1397•Linda J. Cobb v. Department of Veterans Affairs
06-1397Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitDec 20, 2006
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 06-1397
LINDA J. COBB,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS,
Defendant - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle
District of North Carolina, at Durham. William L. Osteen, District
Judge. (1:04-cv-00872-WLO)
Submitted: November 17, 2006 Decided: December 20, 2006
Before WILKINSON, NIEMEYER, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Linda J. Cobb, Appellant Pro Se. Gill Paul Beck, Lynne P. Klauer,
OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Greensboro, North Carolina;
Howard C. Lem, DURHAM VETERANS ADMINISTRATION MEDICAL CENTER,
Durham, North Carolina, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
- 2 -
PER CURIAM:
Linda J. Cobb appeals the district court’s order
dismissing this Title VII action for failure to state a claim and
insufficient service of process. We have reviewed the record and
find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons
stated by the district court. Cobb v. Department of Veterans
Affairs, No. 1:04-cv-00872-WLO (M.D.N.C. Jan. 20, 2006). We
dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions
are adequately presented in the materials before the court and
argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.