The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
06-1391•Liestiawati Widjaja v. ALBERTO R. GONZALES, Attorney General of the United States
06-1391Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitOct 24, 2006
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 06-1391
LIESTIAWATI WIDJAJA,
Petitioner,
versus
ALBERTO R. GONZALES, Attorney General of the
United States,
Respondent.
On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration
Appeals. (A95-218-562)
Submitted: September 22, 2006 Decided: October 24, 2006
Before MOTZ, KING, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.
Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Arnedo S. Valera, LAW OFFICES OF VALERA & ASSOCIATES, Fairfax,
Virginia, for Petitioner. Peter D. Keisler, Assistant Attorney
General, M. Jocelyn Lopez Wright, Assistant Director, Kristin K.
Edison, OFFICE OF IMMIGRATION LITIGATION, Washington, D.C., for
Respondent.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
-- 1 of 2 --
- 2 -
PER CURIAM:
Liestiawati Widjaja, a native and citizen of Indonesia,
seeks review of an order of the Board of Immigration Appeals
(Board) denying her motion to reconsider. We have reviewed the
administrative record and conclude that the Board did not abuse its
discretion in denying Widjaja’s motion. See 8 C.F.R. § 1003.2(a),
(b) (2006).
Accordingly, we deny the petition for review for the
reasons stated by the Board. See In re: Widjaja, No. A95-218-562
(B.I.A. Mar. 6, 2006). We dispense with oral argument because the
facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the
materials before the court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
PETITION DENIED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.