The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
06-1382•Wayne Lorenzo Davis v. ROBERT E. HYMAN, Trustee
06-1382Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitOct 4, 2006
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 06-1382
WAYNE LORENZO DAVIS,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
ROBERT E. HYMAN, Trustee,
Defendant - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of Virginia, at Richmond. Robert E. Payne, District
Judge. (3:05-cv-00519-REP; BK-04-34074-DOT)
Submitted: September 28, 2006 Decided: October 4, 2006
Before NIEMEYER, TRAXLER, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Wayne Lorenzo Davis, Appellant Pro Se. Robert Edward Hyman,
GODDIN, MAJOR, SCHUBERT & HYMAN, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
-- 1 of 2 --
- 2 -
PER CURIAM:
Wayne Lorenzo Davis appeals the district court’s order
affirming the bankruptcy court’s order dismissing his Chapter 13
petition. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible
error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the
district court. Davis v. Hyman, No. 3:05-cv-00519-REP; BK-04-
34074-DOT (E.D. Va. Mar. 7, 2006). In light of this disposition,
we deny Davis’ motions for stay and for preparation of a transcript
at government expense. We grant Davis’ motion to amend his
informal brief and dispense with oral argument because the facts
and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials
before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.