The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
06-1352•Aubrey J. El v. COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA, Department of Social Services, Ex Rel Margo El, Anthony…
06-1352Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitJul 31, 2006
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 06-1352
AUBREY J. EL,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA, Department of Social
Services, Ex Rel Margo El, Anthony Conyers,
Jr., Commissioner for the Commonwealth of
Virginia Department of Social Services;
NATHANIEL L. YOUNG, JR., Individually and in
his Official Capacity as Director of the
Commonwealth of Virginia Department of Social
Services, Division of Child Support
Enforcement,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of Virginia, at Richmond. Robert E. Payne, District
Judge. (3:05-cv-00648-REP)
Submitted: July 25, 2006 Decided: July 31, 2006
Before WILLIAMS, MOTZ, and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Aubrey J. El, Appellant Pro Se. Judith Williams Jagdmann, James
Walter Hopper, Edward Meade Macon, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL
OF VIRGINIA, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
-- 1 of 2 --
- 2 -
PER CURIAM:
Aubrey J. El appeals the district court’s orders denying
his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) action and his motions for
reconsideration. We have reviewed the record and find no
reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by
the district court. El v. Commonwealth of Va., No. 3:05-cv-00648-
REP (E.D. Va. Feb. 10, 2006). We dispense with oral argument
because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in
the materials before the court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.