Amar Bey v. United Parcel Service, Incorporated

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 06-1346
AMAR BEY,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
UNITED PARCEL SERVICE, INCORPORATED; TEAMSTERS
LOCAL UNION NO. 71,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western
District of North Carolina, at Statesville. Richard L. Voorhees,
District Judge. (5:05-cv-00208)
Submitted: August 24, 2006 Decided: August 29, 2006
Before KING, SHEDD, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Amar Bey, Appellant Pro Se. Meredith S. Jeffries, Susan Ballantine
Molony, ALSTON & BIRD, LLP, Charlotte, North Carolina; John David
James, SMITH, JAMES, ROWLETT & COHEN, LLP, Greensboro, North
Carolina; James Francis Wallington, BAPTISTE & WILDER, PC,
Washington, D.C., for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).

-- 1 of 2 --

- 2 -
PER CURIAM:
Amar Bey appeals the district court’s order dismissing
his claim that his employer violated Section 301 of the Labor
Management Relations Act (“LMRA”) and that his union breached its
duty of fair representation regarding his termination. The
district court construed his complaint to be a “hybrid 301" action
under the LMRA. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible
error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the
district court. Bey v. UPS, No. 5:05-cv-00208 (W.D.N.C. Feb. 13,
2006). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal
contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the
court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED

-- 2 of 2 --