The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
06-1314•Norman L. Nichols, Jr v. Caroline County Board of Education
06-1314Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitNov 3, 2006
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 06-1314
NORMAN L. NICHOLS, JR.,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
CAROLINE COUNTY BOARD OF EDUCATION,
Defendant - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
Maryland, at Baltimore. William D. Quarles, Jr., District Judge.
(1:05-cv-02658-WDQ)
Submitted: October 18, 2006 Decided: November 3, 2006
Before MICHAEL, KING, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Norman L. Nichols, Jr., Appellant Pro Se. Steven Bruce
Schwartzman, HODES, ULMAN, PESSIN & KATZ, PA, Towson, Maryland, for
Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
-- 1 of 2 --
- 2 -
PER CURIAM:
Norman L. Nichols, Jr., appeals the district court’s
orders granting the Caroline County Board of Education’s Fed. R.
Civ. P. 12(b)(6) motion to dismiss and denying Nichols’ motion to
reconsider, which the district court construed as a Fed. R. Civ. P.
59(e) motion to alter or amend, in this employment discrimination
case. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error.
Accordingly, we affirm both orders for the reasons stated by the
district court. Nichols v. Caroline Cnty. Bd. of Education, No.
1:05-cv-02658-WDQ (D. Md. Jan. 6 and Feb. 24, 2006). We dispense
with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are
adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument
would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.