The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
06-1313•Henry Immanuel v. United States Department of Labor
06-1313Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitFeb 23, 2007
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 06-1313
HENRY IMMANUEL,
Petitioner,
versus
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF LABOR; THE RAILWAY
MARKET,
Respondents.
On Petition for Review of an Order of the Administrative Review
Board. (04-062-ARB)
Submitted: February 5, 2007 Decided: February 23, 2007
Before NIEMEYER, KING, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.
Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Richard E. Condit, PUBLIC EMPLOYEES FOR ENVIRONMENTAL
RESPONSIBILITY, Washington, D.C., for Petitioner. Thomas J.
McAndrew, Providence, Rhode Island, for Respondents.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
- 2 -
PER CURIAM:
Henry Immanuel petitions for review of the United States
Department of Labor Administrative Review Board’s Final Decision
and Order accepting the Administrative Law Judge’s Recommended
Decision and Order to dismiss his complaint for being untimely
under the statutory deadline. We have reviewed the record and find
no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny the petition for the
reasons stated by the Administrative Review Board. Immanuel v.
United States Dep’t of Labor, No. 04-062-ARB (ARB Dec. 30, 2005).
We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal
contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the
court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
PETITION DENIED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.