The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
06-1287•David W. Johnson v. Nelson, II, Rockville, Maryland, for
06-1287Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitJan 24, 2007
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 06-1287
DAVID W. JOHNSON,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
METROPOLITAN WASHINGTON AIRPORTS AUTHORITY,
Defendant - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Claude M. Hilton, Senior
District Judge. (1:05-cv-00281-CMH)
Submitted: January 9, 2007 Decided: January 24, 2007
Before TRAXLER and NIEMEYER, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior
Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Adrian V. Nelson, II, Rockville, Maryland, for Appellant. Morris
Kletzkin, Mark D. Crawford, Katrina E. Mulligan, FRIEDLANDER,
MISLER, SLOAN, KLETZKIN & OCHSMAN, P.L.L.C., Washington, D.C.;
Joseph E. Kalet, Associate General Counsel, METROPOLITAN WASHINGTON
AIRPORTS AUTHORITY, Washington, D.C., for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
David W. Johnson appeals the district court’s order granting
summary judgment to his employer on claims of race discrimination
and retaliation under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, 42
U.S.C. § 2000e, and a claim that his employer violated 42 U.S.C.
§ 1981 by refusing to continue a contract of employment based on
race. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error.
Accordingly, we affirm substantially on the reasoning of the
district court. See Johnson v. Metropolitan Washington Airports
Authority, No. 05-281 (E.D. Va. January 24, 2006). We dispense
with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are
adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument
would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.