Andy Alexander Tjhang v. Gonzales, 435 F.3d 475, 481 4th Cir. 2006 . Accordingly, we deny the

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 06-1286
ANDY ALEXANDER TJHANG,
Petitioner,
versus
ALBERTO R. GONZALES, Attorney General,
Respondent.
On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration
Appeals. (A79-342-411)
Submitted: October 27, 2006 Decided: November 29, 2006
Before WILKINSON, WILLIAMS, and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges.
Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Matthew W. Rau, LAW OFFICE OF MATTHEW W. RAU, Arlington, Virginia,
for Petitioner. Rod J. Rosenstein, United States Attorney, Allen
F. Loucks, Assistant United States Attorney, Baltimore, Maryland,
for Respondent.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).

-- 1 of 2 --

- 2 -
PER CURIAM:
Andy Alexander Tjhang, a native and citizen of Indonesia,
petitions for review of an order of the Board of Immigration
Appeals (“Board”) denying his motion to reconsider its prior order,
which adopted and affirmed the immigration judge’s denial of his
applications for asylum, withholding of removal, and relief under
the Convention Against Torture. We have reviewed the record and
the Board’s order and find that the Board did not abuse its
discretion in denying the motion to reconsider. See 8 C.F.R.
§ 1003.2(a) (2006); Jean v. Gonzales, 435 F.3d 475, 481 (4th Cir.
2006). Accordingly, we deny the petition for review for the
reasons stated by the Board. See In re: Tjhang, No. A79-342-411
(B.I.A. Feb. 7, 2006). We dispense with oral argument because the
facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the
materials before the court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
PETITION DENIED

-- 2 of 2 --