The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
06-1266•Bart D. Cezar v. William D. Smith
06-1266Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitNov 14, 2006
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 06-1266
BART D. CEZAR,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
WILLIAM D. SMITH,
Defendant - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
Maryland, at Baltimore. J. Frederick Motz, District Judge.
(1:04-cv-03966-JFM)
Submitted: October 18, 2006 Decided: November 14, 2006
Before MICHAEL, TRAXLER, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed as modified by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Ernest P. Francis, ERNEST P. FRANCIS, LTD., Arlington, Virginia,
for Appellant. William D. Smith, Atlanta, Georgia, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
-- 1 of 2 --
- 2 -
PER CURIAM:
Bart D. Cezar appeals the district court’s order
dismissing his civil complaint alleging a violation of the Fair
Debt Collection Practices Act, 15 U.S.C. § 1692 (2000). We have
reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we
affirm the district court’s order, which is modified to reflect
that Appellee’s motion to dismiss was converted into a motion for
summary judgment. See Cezar v. Smith, No. 1:04-cv-03966-JFM (D.
Md. Jan. 25, 2006). We dispense with oral argument because the
facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the
materials before the court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
AFFIRMED AS MODIFIED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.